The flip side to a Facebook crackdown
Hi all,
Rob Crumby has invited me to guest blog on the SIPA UK blog, so here goes...
It's easy enough to go about banning Facebook in the workplace because of productivity fears. This typical, generalising policy is in place in many organisations and there are numerous pieces of "research" to help justify your actions. But, is Facebook really a problem? And, looking at it another way, what are the ramifications of banning Facebook?
If the latest survey from Telindus is to be believed (see the Melcrum Internal Comms Hub news story here), some 39% of workers aged between 18-24 would consider quitting their jobs if their employer put a full ban on social networking sites - and 80% of the 1,000 surveyed do access such sites at work.
In a clear statement to employers wondering what to do, almost half of workers believe it would be better to restrict personal internet usage to lunch or out of work hours, rather than ban access completely. Surely this is a better option than banning it outright?
Shel Holtz has another angle on this continuing story, which over on The Melcrum Blog we've covered a lot in the last 18 months. According to the latest analysis from the US Labour Department – and despite rapid growth in Facebook's popularity (did you see it recently matched and surpassed MySpace as the biggest social network? See image below) – productivity in the US has actually increased faster than expected in the first quarter of 2008. That's despite lots of job cuts, a horrible economic climate and lots of uncertainty - and millions of workers having access to Facebook/the Web at work.
According to many consultants and pundits, wasn't Facebook going to cost businesses billions in lost productivity? Yup, that's what quite a few said. (Example 1 and Example 2 for starters.).
So, what's the deal here?
Telling Sky News Online, Telindus managing director, Mark Hutchinson said, "The key to appreciating the younger generation is to understand that they communicate in a totally different way. To have a phone on your desk is alien, they use YouTube and Facebook on a daily basis."
Exactly, and that comment also reminds me of a recent quote at the Enterprise 2.0 Forum from David Backley, CTO at Westpac (one of the four major banks in Australia): "People coming into the workplace are not demanding these tools [social networking, blogs, IM etc], they're actually expecting them to be available."
IT departments are scared of social media. Businesses are scared, (as they were when the individual telephone on a desk was introduced, as Shel Holtz often says). But in the long term, by putting heads in the sand and creating a nice iron curtain around your employees, your company is going to look quite unappealing next to the competitor who is making more of an effort to understand the increasingly varied demands of the 100% networked employee. All you're actually doing is demonstrating a complete lack of understanding about this new "stuff".
Conversation, dialogue, social networking, blogs, personal sites, personal publishing, easy-to-use software... this is how things are going. We're not going to go back to how things were 10, 5 or even 2 years ago.
It's wise to consider the threats and risks, but you should spend an equal amount of time weighing up the opportunities and potential advantages, because you can keep pining for the "good ol' days", or you can wake up and smell the internet coffee.
Facebook's rise and usurping of MySpace as the world's #1 social networking site (image via Tech Crunch)



Recent Comments